Carer’s Allowance: Division 20 - 16 Oct 2024 (Rejected)
Voting Chart
◯ Aye (→)
▢ No (←)
△ Abstain (↗︎)
Hover or click on a point to see information
Legislation Summary
Support for unpaid carers by addressing financial challenges and reviewing Carer's Allowance.
Legislation Key Points
This legislation highlights the significant contributions of the UK's 5.7 million unpaid carers to society and the financial challenges they face. Key points include:
Concerns about unfair penalties for overpayments of Carer’s Allowance due to the £151-a-week earnings limit.
Calls for immediate write-off of existing overpayments and a raised earnings limit.
The need for a comprehensive review of support systems for carers to alleviate stress and improve their financial situation.
Additionally, the legislation condemns previous government inaction on these issues and emphasizes the necessity for adequate support to maintain the health and wellbeing of carers.
Raw Legislation Text
That this House recognises the remarkable contributions that the UK’s 5.7 million unpaid carers make to society and the huge financial challenges many face; notes with deep concern that tens of thousands of carers are unfairly punished for overpayments of Carer’s Allowance due to the £151-a-week earnings limit; believes that carers should not be forced to face the stress, humiliation and fear caused by demands for repayments of Carer’s Allowance; condemns the previous Government for failing to address this scandal; calls on the Government to write-off existing overpayments immediately, raise the Carer’s Allowance earnings limit and introduce a taper to end the unfair cliff edge; and further calls on the Government to conduct a comprehensive review of support for carers to help people juggle care and work. “; believes it is essential that carers are provided with the support they need at the time they need it; condemns the previous Government for failing to address the scandal of demands for repayments of Carer’s Allowance; and welcomes the Government’s review into how these overpayments have occurred, what best can be done to support those who have accrued them and how to reduce the risk of these problems occurring in future.” “believes that carers should not be forced to face the stress, humiliation and fear caused by demands for repayments of Carer’s Allowance”. “I cared for my mother, who had Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia plus severe osteoarthritis, for several years. At the time of this, if the person requiring care was deemed capable of performing any self-care tasks, only part of the Carer’s Allowance was paid. My mother would, occasionally, wipe a flannel over her face and was therefore deemed to be capable of self-care, despite all other evidence. Caring for someone is not a 9 to 5 job, it is often a 24 hour job, as in my case, with no break for the carer (as few are ever told about respite care). Those who manage employment outside the home are also overburdened, as they have no time to decompress from their paid employment before having to spend their time at home caring for someone. Due to the nature of being a carer, the carer’s physical and mental health often declines and goes untreated as they often have no help with their situation from the Authorities or, should they have them, siblings. That alone can impact the carer’s own physical and mental health, but carers go unnoticed until there is a crisis. To only receive the paltry current Carer’s Allowance, which will barely cover utilities and Council Tax, ignoring food and clothing, is an insult to people who are working far harder than most but remain unseen as it is not deemed to be a ‘real job’ and is considered ‘easy.’ Only those who have cared for another adult know this is blatantly untrue.” “When you get Carer’s Allowance, the person you care for will usually stop getting: a severe disability premium paid with their benefits” “an extra amount for severe disability paid with Pension Credit”. “This government will keep eligibility criteria and processes of Carer’s Allowance under review, to see if it is meeting its objectives.” “he never complains about being a young carer.” “the benefit system can have a real impact on whether you incentivise or disincentivise work.”
Suffrago gets even better with a larger screen!
Unfortunately your screen and/or window size is too small to view all this page can do! If you view this page on a larger device or in a larger window you can see how each MP voted, and go directly to their constituency to see how their constituents reacted to this vote.